Other options include the ViewSonic VX2880ml and the Planar IX2850. The monitor serves up 3,840 x 2,160 at 60Hz alongside strong image quality. Samsung’s U28D590D is currently $520 at many retailers, a sale that may or may not last through the holidays. You don’t need to spend over a thousand dollars for an impressive picture. But what can you get, really, for about five Benjamins? Certainly the top-tier models are out of the question. Spending $80 to $100 of the $600 budget doesn’t leave you with a lot to spend on the monitor itself. You can’t use either connection for 4K at 60Hz, but you can use them to add a second monitor. In addition to offering DisplayPort, they typically provide HDMI and DVI. They also work with a 300-watt (or better) power supply, which is common. These are generally $100.īoth cards are small, quiet and will fit into any PCI 2.0 or PCI 3.0 slot. Nvidia fans must spend a bit more, unfortunately, for a GTX 750 with a DisplayPort connector. Asus Radeon R7 250x Bill Robertson/Digital Trends The Radeon HD7770 can do the same, but availability is limited, as it’s an older design that’s going out of stock. The best option is probably a Radeon R7 250, which can do 3,840 x 2,160 at 60Hz over DisplayPort.
#Update video card on mac for 4k upgrade
Thankfully, you can grab an upgrade that supports the full resolution at 60Hz without spending a fortune.
#Update video card on mac for 4k series
Intel’s HD 3000 series goes no higher than 2,560 x 1,440, and systems with integrated graphics built before 2010 are often capable of no more than 1080p. Other, older desktops can’t support the resolution at all. The latest Intel HD4400/4600 graphics technically support 3,840 x 2,160 at 60Hz, but not all systems with Intel HD 4000 Graphics have the DisplayPort output needed to carry the signal.
Many users can’t make the move to 4K because of their system’s video output. If you can afford to buy a new mid-range desktop, a high-end video card, or a new iPad, you can afford 4K for your desktop.
Yet the price is not as high as you might think. It’s true Ultra HD isn’t cheap, and it’s certainly more expensive than buying nothing at all. Another 18 percent said they had to spend money on better hardware first. While about a third of the respondents said they plan to take the plunge (or already have), and almost half felt the upgrade is still too expensive to be obtainable. ViewSonic VX2880mlRecently I posted a poll asking Digital Trends readers if they’re upgrading their computer to 4K this holiday shopping season, and why they’ve made their choice.
0 kommentar(er)
